Initial interest confusion: attempting to define its current status within European trade mark law

Blythe, Alice (2016) Initial interest confusion: attempting to define its current status within European trade mark law. European Intellectual Property Review, 38 (11). pp. 201-207. ISSN 0142-0461

[img]
Preview
Text
Initial Interest Confusion Attempting to define its current status draft 4 for uploading to UBIR.pdf

Download (305kB) | Preview

Abstract

Initial interest confusion is a controversial doctrine and has, until now, been largely resisted or ignored. Following Interflora v. Marks & Spencer (CAII) and OCH-Ziff Management v. OCH Capital it is necessary to ask whether it ought to be accepted within European trade mark law, and if so, where within the current framework it should sit.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in the European Intellectual Property Review following peer review. The definitive published version Alice Blythe, Initial Interest Confusion: Attempting to Define its Current Status Within European Trade Mark Law [2016] E.I.P.R. 201-207 is available online on Westlaw UK or from Thompson Reuters DocDel service.
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: School of Law
Depositing User: Miss Alice Blythe
Date Deposited: 01 Mar 2018 14:30
Last Modified: 04 Jul 2019 13:46
URI: http://ubir.bolton.ac.uk/id/eprint/1382

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

>